How does Portfolio Manager Anna Lunden think about searching for alpha in large-cap equities? She explains, "it's about drawing on every tool in the toolbox," including macro insights from strategists like Nick Wylenzek. Tune into their conversation about the teamwork involved in navigating this asset class on the latest WellSaid podcast with host Thomas Mucha.
Portfolio Manager Anna Lunden and Macro Strategist Nick Wylenzek talk about how to navigate macroeconomic shifts and trends like AI in global large-cap investing.
2:05 – Small-caps and the big picture
7:10 – How policy impacts philosophy and portfolios
10:30 – AI and the large-cap index skew
13:25 – Ripple effects (and opportunities) of AI
17:35 – Structure, risk-management, and the pursuit of alpha
Anna Lunden: What we're using to help guide our attention as stock pickers is obviously fundamental conviction. So, within the Wellington investment platform, we have sector specialists, including within defense, of course, who will be recommending ideas. We also then filter those ideas based on quant metrics and Nick’s top-down macro insights.
Thomas Mucha: In the world of active investing, alpha is king. Now, delivering higher returns than a benchmark with the same amount of risk is, of course, what active managers are paid to do. Generating this alpha consistently requires skill, experience, and teamwork. And while it's never easy to do, certain areas of the market are even harder than others — large cap stocks, for example, are notoriously stingy with alpha opportunities given their cap-weighted indexes, large investment flows, high liquidity, and, of course, extensive analyst coverage.
Now, despite those challenges, there are ways to generate alpha in global large caps, and my guests today, Portfolio Manager Anna Lunden and Macro Analyst Nick Wylenzek, are testaments to that. And I started her career as a small-cap manager and now applies her approach to alpha generation in that asset class to large caps. Nick is a veteran macro analyst who believes, as I do from the geopolitical perspective, that top-down views are an important alpha discovery input for the investment process.
They're both here today to spill their secrets. Anna, Nick, great to have you here. And welcome to WellSaid.
Anna Lunden: Thanks so much, Thomas. Great to be here.
Nick Wylenzek: It's great to be back. Thank you for having me.
Thomas: All right, Anna, let's start with you and with the big picture. So, from your experience, what does it take to generate alpha consistently with long-only large-cap investing? I mean, what are the key variables here?
Anna: So, I think it's a combination of, obviously, great bottom-up stock ideas. But you cannot have that alone. It's a lot around a process discipline. And what we like to do is also make sure that we are drawing on every tool in the toolbox. So, what we reference as a multidisciplinary approach is really the secret, we believe, to success.
To go back to your point around, this is a part of the market that everybody is poring over —you need to have differentiated insights. And they might come from the sector specialist who's looking at the stock, but they could equally come from Nick's top-down work that helps pivot conviction in a certain direction.
Thomas: Or the geopolitical strategist who might have an insight?
Anna: Absolutely. In fact, geopolitics has featured heavily, in recent years, as you will be acutely aware. We're really trying to pull all the pieces of the puzzle together in a very structured way. And then when we build our portfolios, we do it also in a very disciplined fashion. And we're trying to maintain very good balance across the portfolios, so that really it allows the stock-specific risk to be the main contributor to performance, as opposed to factors or country bets or sector bets, because that's not where we think we have our edge.
Thomas: So, I did mention that you were also a successful small-cap investor. What aspects of managing small caps do you find useful in your current role?
Anna: I cut my teeth in small caps as an investor. I think it's a great way to, first of all, hone your skill as a fundamental analyst. Small caps are less well covered than large caps. You have to do a lot more of the heavy lifting yourself. So, it's a wonderful way of coming across a very diverse range of business models and companies.
It also teaches you to sift through an enormous universe of stocks. So, as I'm looking globally, I've basically used different screening methodology that has evolved over time to help me focus my attention on the stocks that are most likely going to generate alpha for the client.
Small cap also teaches humility. This is a part of the market where we see a lot of volatility. Things can change very quickly. Risks can flare up. And so, having earned our battle scars in small cap I think equips us well to navigate other parts of the market. And then, you know, the portfolio construction technique that I learned as a small-cap investor was very bottom up, and I think that's how a lot of small-cap portfolio managers approach their opportunity. I learned through many tough lessons that portfolio construction and risk management is absolutely key to the to the long-term return profile.
Thomas: So, fundamentals and battle scars?
Anna: Yes. Most certainly.
Thomas: Nick, let's turn to you. Macro and geopolitical dynamics are important investment inputs — even for fundamental stock pickers like Anna. So, two questions for you: Why do you think this is true? And on a practical level, how do you filter your input to be most helpful to Anna and her team?
Nick: Yeah, I think both are great questions. So, first of all, I firmly believe that top-down drivers, such as growth, interest rates, policy uncertainty, volatility, have a major influence on the revenue and earnings growth as well as valuation of most listed companies. So especially when these macro drivers change, I think it's important for even the most fundamental stock pickers to be aware of these changes.
In fact, I think we are in one of these periods of change at the moment. I think we're going through a major macro regime change, similar to what we experienced in 2000, 2007. And that's particularly true in Europe and Japan but also applies more globally.
The world is increasingly fragmented. Decades of deflation have turned into global inflation accelerating, supply chains are being redrawn, populism is on the rise. So, a lot of things are changing. At the same time, policymakers around the world are using both monetary and fiscal tools to support their respective economies. And, while some of these changes are clearly a bit worrying, they create a lot of alpha opportunity for investors like Anna, and I see my role and the role of my colleagues as twofold.
First, make PMS like Anna aware of these changes and what implications that might have for equities from a regional perspective as well as sector perspective. I think my role is also to help them narrow down the opportunity set. So, for example, Anna has one of the broadest opportunity sets in the firm; there are very few companies she can't invest in. So, by flagging the sectors, for example, most exposed to the German fiscal announcement we had earlier this year, who stands to benefit from a pickup in Japanese inflation, which sectors are not priced for a higher-rate environment — all these things help her to narrow down her opportunity set and hopefully make better decisions.
Thomas: Nick, I agree that there are a lot of structural changes happening in the global economy, in the global policy backdrop — a lot of that is obviously being expressed through a greater emphasis on national security, geopolitical change. This is absolutely on display in Europe. We've had a big change in particularly the US policy orientation towards Europe. I'm curious how you think changes in the defense sector, changes in the national security environment are impacting a lot of these variables that you just outlined?
Nick: I think Europe is a great example. For the decade after the global financial crisis, the best performing parts of the European market were international growth companies that benefited from ongoing globalization and exposure to markets like China and the US. These stocks rightfully traded at a premium to their more domestic peers.
But that's clearly changing, right? As you said, the world is getting more fragmented. Geopolitical tensions are rising. At the same time, national security is becoming a more important driver. In Europe, we're seeing bigger focus on encouraging domestic demand, and that now favors more domestically oriented companies.
The second example I would give a macro is really important is when interest rates were at zero, there was essentially no time value to money. This benefited companies with a strong growth trajectory but very long payback period. Unsurprisingly, growth companies in Europe traded at a record high relative to value companies. However, with rates now well above zero, this valuation gap is no longer appropriate.
Thomas: So, there are opportunities there. So, Anna, as a stock picker, how do you apply these big structural shifts in national security and the geopolitical backdrop to your process?
Anna: So, this is where the, the multidisciplinary approach comes in that I alluded to at the beginning of our conversation. What we're using to help guide our attention as stock pickers is obviously fundamental conviction. So, within the Wellington investment platform, we have sector specialists, including within defense, of course, who will be recommending ideas. We also then filter those ideas based on quant metrics and Nick’s top-down macro insights. And so, if we look at the selection of, for example, a German defense company, the route to getting there would have been a strong fundamental conviction coupled with a positive quant signal. And then where we have the highest conviction in the ability to meet those higher spending commitments.
So that's how we build conviction using all these multiple layers of information. When you then introduce that stock into the portfolio, we would be looking at how the risk metrics evolve with the introduction of that name. And while this example might not be the perfect one there, because there are fewer defense companies in Europe to select from, we might have other instances where you're choosing between two similar theses, and one might have a much better impact on the risk profile of the strategy than the other. It's then very obvious for the team which way we want to go, and it drives towards that balanced portfolio construction.
Thomas: Okay, that makes a lot of sense. And I do think from my perspective, there's a lot more disruption coming. And on the geopolitical side, disruption to me means differentiation. And so, I think you're going to and, and Nick will have a lot more, work ahead as you try to decipher these big changes that are happening.
Now, Anna, let's stick with you here. Another theme that obviously is happening in the markets right now, of course, is artificial intelligence. The AI majors, as I'll call them, have been dominating large-cap indexes — massive market caps here with continued upward stock-price appreciation so far. So, what are the challenges, for an investment team like yours, whose remit is delivering alpha in large caps, when you see this kind of index skew?
Anna: This is a big difference compared to small cap, obviously, where we don't have to deal with benchmark concentration. Everything you own is a big bet, so to speak. When we look at large caps, I'd say the world has changed in the last even as short a period as five years. These stocks have become such big parts of our opportunity set that we've had to adapt our approach to portfolio construction in this time period to manage some of those risks, just because they've become so big. Now, in the context of a global strategy, that's a little bit easier to do than in the US only, right, where we have less differentiation. It's easier to think about these names as all moving as one group.
But, of course, there's been quite diverse performance between these big, US tech companies. And that's where our esteemed colleagues on the tech team have really helped us at different points throughout the very rapid evolution of this trend. But I think it's also interesting to see how this, over time, is likely to broaden out, because the US has obviously led the charge here and has a first-mover advantage in many of these areas. The companies have built up huge scale and intellectual property, but we are now moving into a period where we're seeing ecosystems being built in other parts of the world — most notably China. And I think over time, there's going to be an acceptance that there can be winners outside of the US as well in this field.
There will also be a pivot towards more and more use cases evolving over time. So, we’ll, as investors, I think, move our attention from purely being focused on building the foundations of this world to: What are the applications going to be? So, we're trying to, you know, keep up with the very rapid evolution of this. And I think to some extent, my small cap background also drives me to want to look for alpha opportunities outside of these very intensely watched stocks. So, whilst we want to play where we feel we as a firm have a differentiated view, we'd also love to just try and neutralize this part of the market to enable ourselves to earn alpha in other pockets where people are paying less attention, be it industrials, be it consumer, be it in the materials sector, and so on and so forth. So, broaden the horizon.
Thomas: The world is bigger than just AI?
Anna: Correct.
Thomas: That said, I do want to ask one more AI question.
Anna: Of course.
Thomas: There are so many aspects to this. I'm curious how you think about the second- and third-order impacts here of artificial intelligence and how they might impact the performance of other companies across your portfolio that are not in the AI world specifically. So how is that likely to change your process and what are you looking for in terms of finding these opportunities that haven't quite materialized yet?
Anna: It's a really good question; it’s something that we spend an awful lot of time thinking about as a team. You know, some more obvious areas are emerging — within software, within the internet names. I'd say there's going to be more evidence in areas such as health care and industrials over time. But it's really about in analyzing what the individual company is doing and what they're prioritizing and how they are thinking about incorporating AI because some will want to do everything themselves,
others are trying to collaborate, to bring in the expertise. When we analyze companies, one of the key things is the capital allocation discipline of the leadership,
So, I think there's going to be a lot to sift through as this goes into use cases in a in a more tangible way. I don't have all the answers today, I'm just extremely grateful to be surrounded by lots of very smart people who are looking at this from their individual sector lenses and seeking out companies doing smart things.
Thomas: Well, I'll share my specific lens here too, because one of the messages I'm trying to get across is just the centrality of national security when it comes to artificial intelligence. And I don't have a meeting with the Pentagon, the CIA, any NATO country that doesn't have them focusing first on AI in the national security context. So, I do think there's a lot more change coming, in that aspect. And I think that's going to create more winners and losers, more differentiated opportunities across the board. I think we're just getting started in understanding where are the opportunities here.
Anna: Absolutely.
Thomas: Nick, how do you see this playing out across the European landscape? Especially given the fact that European tech firms, you know, are mostly lagging US and Chinese rivals here, as well as the national security implications that this might bring to the continent.
Nick: Yeah, I think I think it's another great question. So, as Anna highlighted earlier, the US is the enabler of AI so far and closely followed by China. We see that in the performance of some of the AI stocks in the US. But I think what hasn't fully played out yet: Who are the big beneficiaries? And I think that's where Europe or Japan could really benefit. Productivity growth in both of these regions has lagged significantly behind the US, for example, if we look at the last 20 years, but these old economies’ sectors that dominate Japan and Europe, they can really benefit from a pickup in in productivity. So, similar to the internet, initially the big winners were the enablers —
Thomas: — picks and shovels —
Nick: — of the internet boom in the in the 90s. But, the big beneficiaries were also the for example, the retailers were able to move online, and other sectors. So, I think that's something we don't know yet — how far AI can actually boost the productivity in Japan and in Europe? And that's also clearly not on the price. So, I think that's where big opportunity is. As you said, Europe’s clearly lagging in terms of the enablers of AI. In terms of the uses of AI? I think the jury's still out there. And I think, I think Europe has as a lot of opportunity to kind of catch up in those areas.
And of course, same with — because you mentioned defense — there are increasingly more defense startups in Europe that exactly trying to use AI and develop defense AI as well. So, I would say defense is one of the areas where Europe can still catch up, especially because also these technologies are not exported as much from the US to other regions, so a lot of funds in Europe are flowing into these areas as well.
Thomas: Certainly a lot more opportunity coming in that sector. Anna, I'm going to wrap up the conversation here, but I want to give you the final word on anything else that you think we've missed in this wide-ranging discussion.
Anna: Oh my goodness. Well, there's obviously so many different pockets of interesting alpha generation opportunities across the globe. I guess what I would say is, the opportunity to distill this in a structured way that is well risk managed is an underappreciated way to get more alpha out of your ideas in all pockets of the market, not just defense, not just AI —
Thomas: — and all around the world —
Anna: — and all around the world.
Thomas: All right. Well, thank you both once again. Portfolio manager Anna Lunden and Macro Analyst Nick Wylenzek, thanks for being with us on WellSaid.
Anna: Thank you very much.
Nick: Thank you for having me.
Views expressed are those of the speaker(s) and are subject to change. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. For professional/institutional investors only. Your capital may be at risk. Podcast produced November 2025.
Wellington Management Company LLP (WMC) is an independently owned investment adviser registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). WMC is also registered with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a commodity trading advisor (CTA) and serves as a CTA to certain clients including commodity pools operated by registered commodity pool operators. WMC provides commodity trading advice to all other clients in reliance on exemptions from CTA registration. WMC, along with its affiliates (collectively, Wellington Management), provides investment management and investment advisory services to institutions around the world. Located in Boston, Massachusetts, Wellington Management also has offices in Chicago, Illinois; Radnor, Pennsylvania; San Francisco, California; Frankfurt; Hong Kong; London; Luxembourg; Milan; Shanghai; Singapore; Sydney; Tokyo; Toronto; and Zurich. This material is prepared for, and authorized for internal use by, designated institutional and professional investors and their consultants or for such other use as may be authorized by Wellington Management. This material and/or its contents are current at the time of writing and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part, for any purpose, without the express written consent of Wellington Management. This material is not intended to constitute investment advice or an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to purchase shares or other securities. Investors should always obtain and read an up-to-date investment services description or prospectus before deciding whether to appoint an investment manager or to invest in a fund. Any views expressed herein are those of the author(s), are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may make different investment decisions for different clients. In Canada, this material is provided by Wellington Management Canada ULC, a British Columbia unlimited liability company registered in the provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, and Saskatchewan in the categories of Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer.
In Europe (excluding the United Kingdom and Switzerland), this material is provided by Wellington Management Europe GmbH (WME) which is authorized and regulated by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht – BaFin). This material may only be used in countries where WME is duly authorized to operate and is only directed at eligible counterparties or professional clients as defined under the German Securities Trading Act. This material does not constitute investment advice, a solicitation to invest in financial instruments or information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy within the meaning of Section 85 of the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz). In the United Kingdom, this material is provided by Wellington Management International Limited (WMIL), a firm authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK (Reference number: 208573). This material is directed only at eligible counterparties or professional clients as defined under the rules of the FCA. In Switzerland, this material is provided by Wellington Management Switzerland GmbH, a firm registered at the commercial register of the canton of Zurich with number CH-020.4.050.857-7. This material is directed only at Qualified Investors as defined in the Swiss Collective Investment Schemes Act and its implementing ordinance. In Hong Kong, this material is provided to you by Wellington Management Hong Kong Limited (WM Hong Kong), a corporation licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission to conduct Type 1 (dealing in securities), Type 2 (dealing in futures contracts), Type 4 (advising on securities), and Type 9 (asset management) regulated activities, on the basis that you are a Professional Investor as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance. By accepting this material you acknowledge and agree that this material is provided for your use only and that you will not distribute or otherwise make this material available to any person. Wellington Investment Management (Shanghai) Limited is a wholly-owned entity and subsidiary of WM Hong Kong.
In Singapore, this material is provided for your use only by Wellington Management Singapore Pte Ltd (WM Singapore) (Registration Number 201415544E). WM Singapore is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under a Capital Markets Services Licence to conduct fund management activities and is an exempt financial adviser. By accepting this material you represent that you are a non-retail investor and that you will not copy, distribute or otherwise make this material available to any person. In Australia, Wellington Management Australia Pty Ltd (WM Australia) (ABN 19 167 091 090) has authorized the issue of this material for use solely by wholesale clients (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001). By accepting this material, you acknowledge and agree that this material is provided for your use only and that you will not distribute or otherwise make this material available to any person. Wellington Management Company LLP is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence (AFSL) under the Corporations Act 2001 in respect of financial services provided to wholesale clients in Australia, subject to certain conditions. Financial services provided by Wellington Management Company LLP are regulated by the SEC under the laws and regulatory requirements of the United States, which are different from the laws applying in Australia. In Japan, Wellington Management Japan Pte Ltd (WM Japan) (Registration Number 199504987R) has been registered as a Financial Instruments Firm with registered number: Director General of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Kin-Sho) Number 428. WM Japan is a member of the Japan Investment Advisers Association (JIAA), the Investment Trusts Association, Japan (ITA) and the Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association (T2FIFA). WMIL, WM Hong Kong, WM Japan, and WM Singapore are also registered as investment advisers with the SEC; however, they will comply with the substantive provisions of the US Investment Advisers Act only with respect to their US clients.
©2025 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved.